© 2000 Wendy Dager
With the recent banning of Dursban, the trade name of a
pesticide produced by a subsidiary of Dow Chemical Corp., nearly all
residential customers will have to seek other forms of insect
eradication. The Environmental Protection Agency also announced that
there will be stricter regulations for Dursban's agricultural use as
well.
Products containing Dursban, the most widely used insecticide in the
United States, will not be pulled from shelves, but will be allowed to
be sold until stockpiles are depleted.
Risky Business
15 to 24 million pounds of Dursban are applied each year,
with between 2 and 4 million used by gardeners. Another 4 to 7 million
pounds are used for pest control in, under, and around homes, schools,
public housing and other public places. For agricultural use the
product is known as Lorsban, and is applied most often to crops of
corn, cotton, apples, alfalfa, and oranges.
Environmental groups that supported termination of the chemicals use
called the limitations a step in the right direction, but are seeking
the permanent elimination of Dursban, which is designed to kill
insects by disrupting their brains and nervous systems.
Environmentalists say that the organophosphates in Dursban are meant
to inhibit the function of cholinesterase, a key enzyme in the
insect's nervous system, but also, frighteningly, affect humans in the
same manner. Youngsters are especially vulnerable to its effects, with
25,000 of the 63,000 reports made to U.S. poison control centers from
1993-1996 involving children. Studies have shown that overexposure to
Dursban can cause dizziness, nausea, paralysis and death.
Fighting the Good Fight
On the heels of the Dursban ban comes the State of California's new
rules governing the use of farm fumigant methyl bromide. The changes
aren't as sweeping as that of Dursban's, but are in line with
proposals the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Environmental
Protection Agency, and the Food and Drug Administration are trying to
implement via a program they established in 1993 called Integrated
Pest Management (IPM). Initially begun as a commitment to supervise
pest control over 75 percent of the nations crop acreage, IPM has come
under fire by entomologists and others for its unclear parameters.
Gasp! Choke!
Wheeze!
A federal policy that promotes IPM without a proper
understanding of IPM is doomed to failure.
But Will It Work?
The USDA and the EPA have struggled to come up with a workable
definition of IPM and an easy way for those in the agriculture
industry to get it going. Problem is, for a farmer to qualify under
the IPM's current guidelines of prevention, avoidance, monitoring, and
suppression (PAMS), he has to use at least three PAMS tactics.
According to Lester E. Ehler and Dale G. Bottrell, professors of
entomology, the major problem with the PAMS approach is that it does
not recognize the concept of integration or compatibility among pest
management tactics as was envisioned by the founders of IPM.
According to the professors, a federal policy that promotes IPM
without a proper understanding of IPM is doomed to failure.
Going Buggy
This is not a comforting thought, particularly for the farmers who
are fighting veritable plagues of pests.
Among the most destructive creepy crawlies currently featured in
agricultural news headlines is the olive fruit fly, which was recently
discovered in Tulare County, California. The single female fly was bad
news for olive growers already facing hard times. The olive fruit fly
is the most serious olive pest, producing a larvae that tunnels
throughout the olive, causing premature fruit drop and a reduction in
yield. Olive fruit flies were also found in Bakersfield and Reedley.
If more are found, a large-scale eradication program will have to be
implemented.
The glassy-winged sharpshooter is another pest that may pose a
devastating threat California, particularly to vineyards.
The moisture-sucking, disease-spreading sharpshooter has been found
in central and northern California and is so feared that Congress
actually passed a farm bill which includes $7.1 million toward
fighting the pest.
Fight Fire With Fire
The good news in the case of the sharpshooter is that there might be
an ecologically sound alternative to typical pest eradication. A
parasitic Mexican wasp, now under quarantine at a university, may be
used in California vineyards this summer.
Wasps arent the only natural enemies used as a biological pest
control. Tiny lizards with huge appetites were recently employed to
kill off the giant flying cockroaches that wreak havoc at San
Franciscos historic Conservancy of Flowers.
Many growers in-the-know have been using such alternative tactics as
mites, lady beetles, green lacewings, minute pirate bugs, assassin
bugs, and hover flies to safely fight pests.
For customers of Albright Seed, A Division of S&S Seeds, Paul
Albright recommends the use of our own Insecta-Flora on orchards and
vineyards.
Insecta-Flora creates a natural insectory that attracts and supports
the beneficials and provides an alternate target for crop destroyers,
drawing them into insect ambush. In addition, our new and improved
Insecta-Flora now has Gopher-Stopper to discourage gophers from
attacking cover crops as well as cash crops such as orchards and
vineyards. This product is available in pound -and-a-quarter bags that
will cover 5,000 square feet. Larger quantities can be special
ordered, and Albright Seed will also create site-specific custom
blends to meet any cover crop need to help you recruit your very own
insect army.
Download
the Albright Seed Catalog as an Acrobat PDF file now
pdf catalog download (55K)
(requires
Acrobat
Reader)